Well. They don’t give a farking damn about the demands made by those who wanted the removal of medieval artistic depictions of the Prophet Muhammad.
And here they tell us why…
The traditional reason given for the Islamic prohibition on images of prophets it to prevent them from becoming objects of worship in a form of idolatry. But, say the editors, the images used were examples of how Muhammad has been depicted by various Islamic sects through history and not in a religious context.
excerpt from guardian.co.uk
and you can find the wikipedia content here
what do you think? Are those pictures and issues blown out of proportion?
Popularity: 1% [?]
